|

|
membre du

|
|
membre du

|









|
|

Free DNA Fetal Kit ® RhD
Non invasive fetal RHD
genotyping in RhD-Negative pregnant women plasma DNA
(Real-Time PCR)
Ref.: 502080233
1
– ANTI-D IMMUNIZATION
In the absence of prophylaxis, anti-D
immunization is a significant cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus
and newborn (HDFN). This severe affection is most often caused upon
fetal RhD-positive red blood cells destruction by anti-D antibodies
present in the blood of an immunized RhD-negative mother that have
crossed the placenta.
The anti-D antibody production can be prevented by immunoprophylaxis
consisting in administration of anti-D immunoglobulin to RhD-negative
mothers.
The
determination of the fetal RHD genotype is essential:
- to establish whether a non anti-D immunized
RhD-negative pregnant woman requires an appropriate
immunoprophylaxis,
- for the management of pregnancy at risk : RhD
negative pregnant women with anti-D, to assess whether the fetus is at
risk of HDFN.
2 – TEST
PRINCIPLE
Prenatal determination of the RHD
genotype became a reality following two major findings: cloning of the
RH (D and CE) genes1,2, and elucidation of the molecular
basis of the
RhD-pos/RhD-neg polymorphism3. These studies have shown that
the RH
locus of RhD-positive individuals is composed of two homologous genes RHD and RHCE, encoding for the RhD
and RhCcEe proteins, respectively, and that the RHD gene is deleted in RhD-negative
individuals of Caucasian origin. Based on these findings, a first
generation of invasive genotyping methods was established by PCR
amplification of exon 10 (of the RHD
gene) by using amniotic fluid or chorionic villus samples in early
pregnancy4,5. With increasing knowledge on the molecular
basis of a
large number of RH variants, the discovery of the RHD pseudogene (RHDψ) frequent in Black
individuals6, and the presence of cell-free fetal DNA in the
maternal
plasma7, a second generation of non invasive PCR methods
based on use
of several primer pairs for the simultaneous detection of different RHD gene regions (exons or introns)
in maternal plasma was designed in many laboratories, mainly in Europe.
According to this new approach, most RH variants could be detected (but
not identified), thus reducing the risk of potentially harmful
false-negative results.
Plasma of pregnant women contains increasing concentrations of fetal
DNA with the gestational age. Indeed, fetal DNA concentration (fetal
genome per ml of plasma) rise from some copies in the first trimester
of pregnancy up to several hundreds copies in the third trimester.
A first generation of RHD
genotyping kit, was based on the amplification of two RHD specific regions in exon 10
(the more conserved) and exon 7 (absent in some variants) by real-time
PCR8,9. The second generation now developed in the present
kit,
includes amplification of a third specific region located in exon 5
that could detect exon 5 from the RHD
gene, but not from the RHDψ
pseudogene10. Accordingly, genotyping exon 5D (not Dψ) will allow to
genotype the fetuses from mother carrying a RHDψ pseudogene. Thus, in addition
to the fetus RHD status
(positive or negative) the presence of the main known RHD variants will be detected.
Consequently, the RHD gene
identified by PCR in plasma of pregnant RhD-negative women (Oxford
University patent) is of fetal origin. For each fetal RHD genotype analysis, total DNA is
extracted from maternal plasma. The presence of a fetal RHD gene in the plasma DNA is
detected by real-time PCR amplifications of three different segments of
the RHD gene (exons 5, 7 and
10), to detect a most large number of RHD
variants. Each amplicon is revealed with specific hydrolysis probes.
[1] Chérif-Zahar B et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990,
87:6243-7 ; [2] Le van Kim et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992,
89:10925-9 ; [3] Colin et al., Blood 1991, 78:2747-52 ; [4] Bennett et
al., N Engl J Med 1993, 329:607-10 ; [5] Lo et al., N Engl J Med 1993,
341:1147-8 ; [6] Singleton et al., Blood 2000, 95:12-8 ; [7] Lo et al.,
N Engl J Med 1998, 339:1734-8 ; [8] Rouillac et al., Mol Diagn 2004,
8:23-31 ; [9] Rouillac-Le Sciellour et al., Transfus Clin Biol 2007,
14:572-7 ; [10] Finning et al., Transfusion 2002, 42:1079-85.
3 – KIT CONTENTS
|
• RHD positive (+) Control
• RHD
negative (-) Control
• [100X] Maize DNA Control (not ready to use)
• Maize exon IVR2 primers
sense/antisense + probe
• RHD exon
5
primers sense/antisense + probe
• RHD
exon 7 primers
sense/antisense + probe
• RHD
exon 10 primers
sense/antisense + probe
|
: 6 x
1000µL (red top)
: 6 x 1000µL (green top)
: 3 x 14 µL (yellow cap insert)
: 3 x 38 µL (green cap insert)
: 3 x 38 µL (purple cap insert)
: 3 x 38 µL (white cap insert)
: 3 x 38 µL (red cap insert) |
4 – ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENTS AND REAGENTS REQUIRED
The
following equipments and reagents are not included but are required to
perform the assay :
* Kit for Plasma DNA extraction (with equipment and
associated accessories) :
“QIAamp DSP
virus kit” (IVD CE) 50 columns, QIAGEN Ref. 60704
* Reagent(reactive) real time PCR :
- For
LightCycler® : kit "LightCycler® Taqman® Master" Roche,
Ref. 04 535
286 001. (50 reactions), or Ref. 04 735 536 001 (480 reactions).
-
Other instrument (ABI, MX) :
(kit
"Faststart Taqman®
ProbeMaster" Roche, Ref. 04673409 - 100 reactions).
* Consumables for real time PCR instrument, with system glass
capillaries (20µl), or with multi-well plate.
* Nuclease-DNA free labwares : pipettes and
specific tips with filter for PCR
* Molecular biology grade water
5 –
LIMITS
This
test is exclusively validated for the analysis of human plasmas
collected on EDTA or ACD anticoagulants. Heparin inhibits the PCR and
must not be used with this method.
It is recommended to perform
this test on samples taken from 12 weeks of amenorrhea (sufficient
level of circulating fetal DNA).
A negative fetal RHD genotype
on a first blood maternal sample
taken before 18 weeks of amenorrhea
must be considered as probable, and has to be confirmed on a second
maternal blood sample collected at least 2 weeks later to prevent a
false-negative result.
A positive fetal RHD genotype
on a first blood maternal sample can be considered as acquired.
A false positive result is possible by cross contamination, or if the RHD fetal haplotype is a silent
variant.
6
– PERFORMANCES
A study concerning 300 samples stemming from plasmas of pregnant women
of RhD negative phenotype was made (Rouillac-Le
Sciellour C., Sérazin V., Brossard Y., Oudin O., Le Van Kim C.,
Colin Y., Guidicelli Y., Menu M., Cartron JP. Noninvasive fetal RHD
genotyping from maternal plasma. Use of a new developed Free DNA Fetal
RhD. Trans Clin Biol 2007; 14:572-7) (Read the full article).
The results were compared with the phenotype RhD of the child in the
birth, as well as in the technique initially developed by Rouillac-Le
Sciellour C. and al. (C.
Rouillac-Le Sciellour, P. Puillandre, R. Gillot, C. Baulard, S. Métral,
C. Le Van Kim, J-P. Cartron, Y. Colin, Y. Brossard, Large-scale
pre-diagnosis study of fetal RHD
Genotyping by PCR on Plasma DNA from RhD-Negative pregnant Women, Mol
Diagn 2004; 8:23-31). (Read the full article).
100 % of correlations were obtained between the 2 methods.
No false-negative result, defined by the absence of amplification of RHD
exons, was found from children with a RhD-positive phenotype. All the
mothers whose children were phenotypically RhD-positive had a
genotyping on their plasma revealing the presence of the fetal RHD gene.
Currently however, a false-negative result cannot be excluded in the
absence of a universal fetal DNA marker.
7 – DECISION TREE
|